Observational studyScientific reports2026
Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after transanal total mesorectal excision in a retrospective cohort of 212 patients.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage remains a major complication in colorectal surgery. Although several risk factors have been identified, the specific risks associated with TaTME procedures require further clarification. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of anastomotic leakage after TaTME and to identify factors influencing leakage rates. Out of 237 patients who underwent TaTME, 229 received an anastomosis. Seventeen were excluded from further analysis-14 due to lack of leakage assessment before ileostomy closure and 3 due to missing follow-up data-resulting in a final cohort of 212 patients. Cases were analysed with respect to anastomotic technique and other variables potentially affecting the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The mean tumour distance from the anorectal junction (ARJ) was 2.92 cm (± 1.56). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 27 patients (12.74%). The only statistically significant risk factor for leakage was the type of anastomosis: leakage occurred in 18.28% of patients with hand-sewn anastomosis and in 8.47% of those with stapled anastomosis. Tumour height indirectly influenced the leakage rate, as hand-sewn anastomosis was used predominantly in lower tumours (1.78 cm vs. 3.82 cm from the ARJ). Anastomotic leakage rates after TaTME are comparable to those reported for other rectal cancer surgical techniques. Leakage risk is primarily determined by the type of anastomosis and, indirectly, by tumour height. TaTME appears to be a feasible option for selected patients in experienced centres, although further validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.