Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781483›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2026

Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after transanal total mesorectal excision in a retrospective cohort of 212 patients.

Bartosz Kapturkiewicz, Michal Kazanowski, Pawel Lesiak, David Ramsey, Marek Bebenek

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bartosz KapturkiewiczDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Pl. Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 , Wroclaw, Poland. bartosz.kapturkiewicz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2894-4834
Michal KazanowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Pl. Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 , Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8080-3001
Pawel LesiakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Pl. Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 , Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6454-4943
David RamseyDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-1436
Marek BebenekDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Pl. Hirszfelda 12, 53-413 , Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-7286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage remains a major complication in colorectal surgery. Although several risk factors have been identified, the specific risks associated with TaTME procedures require further clarification. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of anastomotic leakage after TaTME and to identify factors influencing leakage rates. Out of 237 patients who underwent TaTME, 229 received an anastomosis. Seventeen were excluded from further analysis-14 due to lack of leakage assessment before ileostomy closure and 3 due to missing follow-up data-resulting in a final cohort of 212 patients. Cases were analysed with respect to anastomotic technique and other variables potentially affecting the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The mean tumour distance from the anorectal junction (ARJ) was 2.92 cm (± 1.56). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 27 patients (12.74%). The only statistically significant risk factor for leakage was the type of anastomosis: leakage occurred in 18.28% of patients with hand-sewn anastomosis and in 8.47% of those with stapled anastomosis. Tumour height indirectly influenced the leakage rate, as hand-sewn anastomosis was used predominantly in lower tumours (1.78 cm vs. 3.82 cm from the ARJ). Anastomotic leakage rates after TaTME are comparable to those reported for other rectal cancer surgical techniques. Leakage risk is primarily determined by the type of anastomosis and, indirectly, by tumour height. TaTME appears to be a feasible option for selected patients in experienced centres, although further validation is required.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalColorectal Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRectumRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41781483
PMCPMC13077035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.