Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Spherical bipolar fuzzy decision model for green infrastructure selection.

Kannusamy Aarthi, Samayan Narayanamoorthy, Navaneethakrishnan Suganthi Keerthana Devi, Krishnan Suvitha, Naif Almakayeel, Hasan Dincer, Serhat Yuksel, Daekook Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kannusamy AarthiDepartment of Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641046, India.
Samayan NarayanamoorthyDepartment of Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641046, India.
Navaneethakrishnan Suganthi Keerthana DeviDepartment of Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641046, India.
Krishnan SuvithaCentre for Nonlinear Systems, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Naif AlmakayeelDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Hasan DincerSchool of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serhat YukselSchool of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.
Daekook KangGraduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology, Hyeonpung-Eup, Dalseong-Gun Daegu, 42988, Republic of Korea. dkkang@dgist.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing urbanization, brought on by population expansion and industrialization, is posing a number of environmental concerns for urban and suburban areas. Urban communities are adapting to the intricacies brought about by a number of factors, including pollution, temperature variations, and climate change. However, achieving adaptation sustainably remains a significant challenge because many existing adaptation strategies lack sustainability, particularly in the context of urban development. Sustainable urban development can be achieved through green initiatives, with green infrastructure (GI) practices playing an essential role in its implementation. Nevertheless, selecting one of the available GI practices might be challenging since their execution necessitates careful assessment of all relevant factors. To this end, we seek the aid of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework. This study considers six GI practices as alternatives, assessed based on environmental, economic, and social dimensions encompassing fourteen criteria. Spherical bipolar fuzzy sets (SBFS) are employed to represent the evaluation information. The significance of each criterion is established using the distance correlation-based criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (D-CRITIC) technique, while the alternatives are ranked through the preference ranking on the basis of ideal-average distance (PROBID) approach. The proposed SBFS-based D-CRITIC-PROBID framework is a significant addition to the literature as a distinctive study on GI assessment. Further, the effectiveness and robustness of the findings are validated through comparison and sensitivity analyses.

Indexed as

Decision-makingGreen infrastructureSpherical bipolar fuzzy setsSustainabilityUrban development

Identifiers

PMID41781478
PMCPMC13076613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.