ArticleScientific reports2026
Medicinal and aromatic plants as climate-smart crops: case studies on Pelargonium graveolens and Viola odorata under Egyptian conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) represent high-value agricultural commodities that provide economic returns through essential oil production while potentially contributing to climate change mitigation via photosynthetic carbon sequestration and oxygen release. Despite their recognized economic importance, few studies have systematically quantified the net environmental performance of MAP cultivation and processing within integrated climate mitigation frameworks. This study evaluated the carbon footprint, oxygen production, and CO₂ absorption of two commercially important MAPs—Pelargonium graveolens (geranium) and Viola odorata (violet)—cultivated under Egyptian field conditions, using life cycle assessment methodology with system boundaries from field operations through extraction. Primary data were collected from commercial farms (geranium: 37 feddans aggregated; violet: 1 feddan) over complete growing cycles. Geranium (6-month season) demonstrated net climate-positive performance with a negative carbon footprint of − 375 kg CO₂-eq. per feddan per season, producing 54,324 m³ of oxygen and absorbing 155,632 kg CO₂ during growth, with photosynthetic uptake exceeding all process emissions (fuel, irrigation electricity, fertilizers, and composting). In contrast, violet (12-month annual cycle) exhibited a positive footprint of + 15,972 kg CO₂-eq. per feddan annually, despite generating 11,148 m³ oxygen and absorbing 12,700 kg CO₂, primarily due to its fuel-intensive solvent extraction process that accounts for 97.3% of total emissions. Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis (N = 10,000 simulations) confirmed geranium’s robustness as a net carbon sink (probability 67.4%) while violet remained a consistent carbon source under current extraction practices. Scenario modeling demonstrated that substituting fossil fuel with solar thermal energy or biogas-derived heat for violet distillation could reduce net emissions by 50–100%, potentially shifting the crop from carbon source to near-neutral status. These findings indicate that MAPs can function as climate-smart crops when cultivation practices are coupled with renewable energy integration in post-harvest processing. The study provides quantitative evidence for prioritizing low-emission extraction technologies and precision irrigation management in MAP value chains to maximize both economic and environmental sustainability outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.