ArticleScientific reports2026
Advanced stacked modeling techniques for material porosity estimation via high-resolution computed tomography imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a deep convolutional neural network (DeepCNN) based framework for the automatic estimation of porosity in concrete materials from two-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) scan images. Addressing the limitations of manual and time-consuming traditional porosity measurement methods, the proposed approach integrates advanced image processing techniques to improve robustness under low resolution and noisy imaging conditions. The DeepCNN architecture comprises a multi stage feature extractor with 21 convolutional layers and an SPP based neck, trained on 20,520 annotated CT images after data augmentation. Preprocessing steps include automated region of interest detection, intensity normalization, and class specific filtering prior to porosity estimation. The framework performs material classification and porosity estimation across multiple concrete classes, including cement-based mortars (CM0, CM5, CM10, CM20), geopolymer based mortar (GM), and ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), using a rule based adaptive thresholding (RBAT) strategy incorporating clustering, filtering, and thresholding operations. Porosity is quantified by computing the ratio of pore area to the total image area. Across all material classes, the estimated porosity values showed close agreement with vacuum pycnometer measurements, with deviations within 2-3%, including deviations of 1.5% for UHPC and 1.3% for CM10. The DeepCNN classifier achieved a precision recall AUC of 1.0 during testing. These results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid framework provides an accurate, automated, and computationally efficient solution for porosity assessment, suitable for practical and industrial CT based material characterization workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.