Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781423›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Application of representation learning in detecting botnet attacks.

Hieu Le Ngoc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hieu Le NgocFaculty of Information Technology, Van Hien University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. hieuln@vhu.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botnet detection remains a perennial and critical challenge in cybersecurity. As long as the internet exists, threat actors will devise new ways to create and disguise these malicious networks, making the development of robust detection methods a task that will never be obsolete. Traditional approaches, relying on rigid signatures and manual feature engineering, are often locked in a reactive cycle. A more critical limitation is their poor generalization; models trained on known botnets frequently fail to detect novel, unseen threats, rendering them vulnerable in real-world scenarios. This paper introduces a robust framework that significantly enhances botnet detection by overcoming these limitations. We propose a novel methodology that combines advanced feature engineering, such as octet splitting for IP addresses, with a sophisticated representation learning technique using the Hilbert space-filling curve to transform network flows into 2D images. This approach preserves data locality and eliminates the noise introduced by traditional zero-padding. Furthermore, we address the critical issue of class imbalance using a combination of SMOTE, a weighted sampler, and Focal Loss to focus the model on more challenging samples. To rigorously evaluate the model's real-world applicability, we employed a challenging cross-scenario validation strategy, training the model on the Murlo botnet (Scenario 8) and testing it on the completely unseen Rbot botnet (Scenario 10) from the publicly available CTU-13 dataset. Our proposed model achieved an outstanding accuracy of 98.34% and a weighted F1-score of 98.38%, demonstrating a remarkable ability to generalize to novel botnet attacks. This result validates our approach and highlights the superiority of learned, spatially-aware representations over traditional models, which failed to detect the unseen botnet. Our work presents a significant step towards creating more adaptive and resilient intrusion detection systems capable of handling novel, unseen botnet families.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionBotnetCybersecurityDeep learningNetwork traffic analysisRepresentation learning

Identifiers

PMID41781423
PMCPMC13068999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.