ArticleScientific reports2026
Green DOE based RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of Azelastine and Losartan in spiked human plasma samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A green RP-HPLC approach coupled with spectrofluorometric detection was established for the simultaneous estimation of the co-administered drugs Azelastine (AZL) and Losartan (LOS) in spiked human plasma samples. Preliminary trials were carried out for determination of the Critical Method Parameters (CMPs) and Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs). Design of Experiment (DOE) was developed relying on the use of Central Composite Design (CCD) for the optimization of conditions to establish a simple, rapid, cost-effective and environmentally benign approach. The chromatographic separation was based on using a mobile phase composed of methanol: acetonitrile: 0.02M phosphate buffer of pH 3.25 with 0.05% tri-ethylamine (60: 1.5: 38.5, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min and injection volume of 10µL. The fluorescence detection was carried out at 245 nm/400 nm and 290 nm/360 nm for estimation of LOS and AZL, respectively. The retention times of AZL and LOS were 8.9 ± 0.2 min and 13.4 ± 0.1 min, respectively. The developed method was validated according to ICH Guidelines with linear relationship in concentration ranges of 0.10–50.0µg/mL for AZL and 0.30–40.0µg/mL for LOS, while in spiked plasma samples the concentration ranges were 0.025–0.07µg/mL for AZL and 0.025–0.10 µg/mL for LOS. The developed approach was successfully applied for the quantitation of both drugs in spiked human plasma samples. Complex MoGAPI and AGREE methodologies were used for greenness assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.