ArticleScientific reports2026
Nanoformulation of pomegranate peel extract enhances anti-psoriatic efficacy in a rat model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 2% of the global population. Current treatments (e.g., corticosteroids and phototherapy) face limitations such as adverse effects and poor bioavailability, necessitating safer, more effective alternatives. Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, rich in bioactive compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, holds therapeutic potential but suffers from low stability and solubility. Here, we developed pomegranate peel extract nanoparticles (PGNPs) to overcome these limitations and evaluated their efficacy in psoriasis management. Pomegranate peel extract (PGE) was prepared and transformed into PGNPs via acid hydrolysis. Nanoparticles were characterized for size, stability, and bioactivity. In vitro assays assessed cytotoxicity, antioxidant (DPPH), and anti-inflammatory (hemolysis inhibition) effects. In vivo efficacy was tested in imiquimod-induced psoriatic rats (n = 20) divided into negative control (group I), untreated psoriasis (group II), PGE-treated (200 mg/kg, group III), and PGNPs-treated (100 mg/kg, group IV). Outcomes included oxidative stress markers (MDA, SOD, CAT, and GSH), cytokines (IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, and IL-10), and histopathology. PGNPs exhibited superior stability (size: 87–91 nm; zeta potential: +41–44 mV) and lower cytotoxicity than PGE (15.2% vs. 31.2% at 1000 µg/mL). In vitro, PGNPs showed higher antioxidant (96.63% DPPH scavenging) and anti-inflammatory (94.66% hemolysis inhibition) activity. In vivo, PGNPs reduced psoriatic lesions more effectively than PGE, normalizing oxidative stress (MDA: 7.26 vs. 12.22 nmol/g tissue) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-17: 102.20 vs. 123.40 pg/g tissue; IFN-γ: 204.40 vs. 216.80 pg/g tissue). Histopathology confirmed enhanced skin regeneration with PGNPs. PGNPs demonstrated enhanced bioavailability, stability, and therapeutic efficacy over crude extract, significantly mitigating psoriasis-like inflammation in rats. These findings highlight PGNPs as a promising nanotherapy for psoriasis, warranting further clinical exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.