Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781399›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026

Tracking response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy through circulating tumor DNA analysis in breast cancer.

Antonio Marra, Sarah H Kim, Fresia Pareja, Thais Basili, David B Solit, Sarat Chandarlapaty, George Plitas, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Britta Weigelt, Tari A King and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonio Marra *Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah H Kim *Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Fresia ParejaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Thais BasiliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
David B SolitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sarat ChandarlapatyDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
George PlitasBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jorge S Reis-FilhoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Britta WeigeltDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. weigeltb@mskcc.org.
Tari A KingBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. TAKING7@emory.edu.
David N BrownDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is a standard treatment approach for patients with early-stage breast cancer, particularly those with stage II-III disease and aggressive subtypes such as HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. While NST improves surgical outcomes and provides prognostic information, accurately assessing preoperative treatment response remains a clinical challenge. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for monitoring disease dynamics and guiding therapeutic decisions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether ctDNA analysis in patients with stage II-III breast cancer (n = 20) could serve as a surrogate for invasive biopsies in molecular profiling and as a tool for monitoring response to NST. At baseline, ctDNA was detectable in the majority of patients by droplet digital (dd)PCR (15/18, 83%) and all patients with longitudinal follow-up had ctDNA clearance after NST (13/13; 100%). A positive correlation was observed between the allele fraction in ctDNA, histologic grade and molecular subtype, suggesting that ctDNA levels may be influenced by tumor biology. None of the three patients with undetectable baseline ctDNA had distant relapse, regardless of whether they achieved pathologic complete response (pCR), compared to 5/15 (33%) with detectable baseline ctDNA. These findings suggest that ctDNA assessment at baseline may provide additional prognostic information to define the risk of patients after NST. While ctDNA shows promise in capturing tumor burden and biological characteristics, its role in predicting pCR and long-term outcomes requires further investigation.

Identifiers

PMID41781399
PMCPMC13076604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.