ArticleNature communications2026
Inverse-designed nanophotonic neural network accelerators for ultra-compact optical computing.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging integrated photonic neural network technologies for artificial intelligence: from devices to systems.National science review · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inverse-designed nanophotonic devices offer promising solutions for analog optical computation, where high-density photonic integration is critical for scaling computational complexity. Here, we present an inverse-designed photonic neural network (PNN) accelerator, enabling ultra-compact and energy-efficient optical computing. Using a wave-based inverse-design method based on three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain simulations, we exploit the linearity of Maxwell's equations to reconstruct arbitrary spatial fields through optical coherence. Each subwavelength voxel serves as a trainable degree of freedom, yielding a computational density of approximately 400 million parameters per mm². By decoupling the forward-pass process into linearly separable simulations, our approach is highly amenable to computational parallelism. We experimentally demonstrate two inverse-designed PNN accelerators, achieving on-chip MNIST and MedNIST classification accuracies of 89% and 90% respectively, within footprints of 20 × 20 µm² and 30 × 20 µm². Our results establish a scalable, energy-efficient platform for photonic computing, bridging inverse nanophotonic design with high-performance optical information processing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.