Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781345›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026

Frequent NPM1 mutation, monoblastic/monocytic origin and prognostic significance of organ and system involvement in myeloid sarcoma: a multicenter study.

Alex Jenei, Béla Kajtár, Tamás László, Hazem A Juratli, Livia Vida, Ágota Szepesi, Réka Mózes, Botond Timár, Jörg Halter, Stefan Dirnhofer and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex JeneiDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Béla KajtárDepartment of Pathology, University of Pécs Medical School, Clinical Centre, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-3709
Tamás LászlóDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Hazem A JuratliHistological Diagnostics, Kempf and Pfaltz, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-7280
Livia VidaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pécs Medical School, Clinical Centre, Pécs, Hungary.
Ágota SzepesiDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-1178
Réka MózesDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Botond TimárDepartment of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-8154
Jörg HalterDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-1956
Stefan DirnhoferInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5250-3159
Alexandar TzankovInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-3819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a tumorous extramedullary proliferation of blast or blast equivalent cells (e.g., promonocytes or promyelocytes). The most frequent cutaneous presentation is often referred to as leukemia cutis (LC). These lesions, especially without the clinical context of a known bone marrow disease, pose a differential diagnostic challenge. In this retrospective multicenter clinico-pathological study on 154 patients with MS or LC, 169 samples were analyzed by morphology, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescent in situ hybridization, and a subset by additional sequencing [TP53]. The majority of cases were lysozyme positive (diffuse in 91% and focal in 5%), 51% showed diffuse and 6% focal expression of CD56, and IRF8 was strongly positive in 31% of the lesions. Lack of myeloperoxidase (MPO), CD117, and CD34 expression was observed in 27%, 39%, and 58%, respectively. PU.1 was positive in almost all instances (95%), but BRAF V600E was consistently negative. CD123 was diffusely (13%) or focally (25%) positive, which, in addition to frequent CD4 (73%) and CD56 expression, pointed to a phenotypic overlap with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms. Survival analysis revealed that MS occurring at sanctuary sites (CNS, orbit, ovary, and testis) was characterized by excellent survival. Similarly to histiocytoses, there was a prognostic difference between isolated and multisystemic involvement by MS. Patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation showed significantly improved survival. In conclusion, this multicenter study suggests that most MS are of myelomonocytic/monoblastic origin, a high proportion of them are NPM1 mutated, and may lack expression of MPO and CD34. NPM1 mutation-specific antibodies should be integrated into the diagnostic panels for MS or LC, while IRF8 and PU.1 are not recommended as they cannot distinguish MS from histiocytic neoplasms.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMonocytesMutationNuclear ProteinsSarcoma, MyeloidSkin NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorNPM1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsNucleophosminextramedullary myeloid proliferationhistiocytosisleukemia cutismonocytemyeloid sarcomaNPM1

Identifiers

PMID41781345
PMCPMC12960061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.