ArticleBMJ leader2026
Expecting better: a leadership reflection on loss, inequity and the future of maternal health.
Article in BMJ leader, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo use a lived-experience account of stillbirth and subsequent pregnancy to examine how maternity care systems respond to trauma, reveal structural and relational failures in maternal health services and propose principles for more just, compassionate leadership in maternity care.
backgroundDespite advances in clinical knowledge, maternal outcomes in the UK have plateaued, with widening inequities by ethnicity, deprivation and other intersecting forms of exclusion. Maternal trauma, including stillbirth and miscarriage, is frequently minimised, poorly recognised in policy and measurement frameworks and inadequately supported in routine care. Personal experience of stillbirth and subsequent pregnancy exposes how systems that appear evidence-based and guideline-driven can fail to provide continuity, psychological safety and trauma-informed support at women's most vulnerable moments.
methodsThis reflective paper integrates first-person narrative of stillbirth, subsequent pregnancy and encounters with maternity and primary care services with professional insight from clinical and leadership roles. The reflection is informed by existing evidence on maternal outcomes, perinatal mental health, intersectionality and global trends in women's health and rights. The narrative is used as an analytic lens to explore how leadership, culture and structures in maternity care shape women's experiences and outcomes.
resultsThe reflection identifies recurrent gaps: silencing of women's voices, inadequate bereavement and mental health support, fragmentation of care and limited recognition of trauma across the maternity pathway. It highlights structural injustice in maternal health, including inequities by race, poverty and migration status, and the marginalisation of outcomes such as stillbirth and early pregnancy loss in key indicators. It proposes leadership practices that are relational, trauma-informed and equity-focused, including embedding lived experience in governance, investing across the preconception-to-postpartum continuum and prioritising culturally safe, psychologically safe care.
conclusionLeadership in maternity care must move beyond metrics and guidelines towards models grounded in humility, listening and justice. By centring lived experience, recognising trauma and addressing structural inequities, leaders can begin to rebuild trust, honour loss and reshape maternity systems to better serve women, babies, families and future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.