Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781153›Full record

ReviewJournal of liver cancer2026

Contemporary overview of liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.

Hae Won Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hae Won LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) were regarded as absolute contraindications for liver transplantation (LT) due to dismal outcomes characterized by high recurrence rates and poor long-term survival in early experiences. Consequently, these malignancies have been systematically excluded from standard transplant criteria for decades. However, the landscape of transplant oncology is undergoing a significant paradigm shift, driven by a deeper understanding of tumor biology and refined patient selection strategies. Recent multicenter retrospective studies have identified a distinct subgroup of patients-specifically those with "very early" iCCA in the setting of cirrhosis-who achieve excellent post-transplant outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. This evidence has prompted major international societies to update their guidelines, cautiously opening the door for LT in this selected population. Conversely, cHCC-CCA remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. This narrative review critically analyzes the pivotal data driving the current paradigm shift and synthesizes the latest clinical practice guidelines to provide a contemporary roadmap for the management of iCCA and cHCC-CCA in the transplant setting.

Indexed as

CholangiocarcinomaCombined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomaLiver transplantationPractice guidelinePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41781153
PMCPMC13062628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.