Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781146›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2026

'Situation awareness' in midwifery practice: a scoping review.

Rachael Budd, Paul Bowie

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachael BuddSchool of Health Education Policing and Sciences, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-7306
Paul BowieSchool of Health Education Policing and Sciences, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK paul.bowie@nhs.scot.ORCID 0000-0001-6027-2559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailure of situational awareness (SA) has been identified as a common theme in potentially avoidable maternal and infant deaths, although the empirical basis for this attribution is unclear. Situation awareness is arguably a contentious issue which needs to be studied methodically to ascertain the theoretical and practical relevance to midwifery to better inform the application of this concept to the clinical context-rather than seemingly and uncritically import the construct from other healthcare areas and safety-critical sectors unrelated to midwifery practice.

objectivesTo identify how situation awareness is defined, understood, measured and interpreted within the midwifery care safety context as a precursor to further research which may contribute to improvements in safety of maternity care.

methodsA scoping review was conducted using a well-established methodological framework. A comprehensive literature search yielded 259 articles, of which 11 were included in the final review. Data from each article were extracted, charted and subjected to a thematic analysis.

findingsAll primary research papers applied Endsley's original definition of situation awareness, either explicitly or implicitly. Team SA was viewed as an aggregate of individual clinicians' SA. Only two of the studies attempted to measure SA; others made inferences about levels of SA based on observable features of teamwork.

conclusionsEndsley's model of SA has been applied to midwifery without full consideration of whether this theoretical construct is appropriate for this clinical context. Other extended SA models exist which could arguably provide a more informed systems-theoretic approach to maternity care safety, consistent with the current drive towards embedding systems thinking and creating a Just Culture in healthcare organisations.

Indexed as

AwarenessMidwiferyFemaleHumansPregnancyHuman factorsMaternal Health ServicesPatient safetySystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID41781146
PMCPMC12970059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.