Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41781046›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Barriers to

Zhenzhen Wang, Chenli Zhang, Jie Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenzhen WangDepartment of General Medicine / Internal Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5150-4740
Chenli ZhangDepartment of General Medicine / Internal Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China croissantjj@126.com zcl10678@rjh.com.cn.
Jie JiangDepartment of General Medicine / Internal Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China croissantjj@126.com zcl10678@rjh.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-7645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to better understand patients' perspectives on

designWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured, in-depth interviews from September to December 2024.

settingThe study was conducted at a large, university-affiliated healthcare centre which provides comprehensive health check-up services to a geographically diverse adult population.

participantsIndividuals aged between 35 and 65 years old who had tested positive for

resultsOf the 23 participants involved in this study, 13 (56.5%) were male, with age ranging from 39 to 62 years. Five key themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Participants perceived

conclusionsBarriers to

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriAdultAgedChinaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTertiary Care CentersAnti-Bacterial AgentsMedication AdherencePatient PreferencePrimary CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID41781046
PMCPMC12970143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.