ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
Plasticity in the structure and assembly of proteasomes.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Interaction of Assembly Factor Rpn14 With the Proteasome Base Reveals a Bipartite Interface and Implies Ordered Remodeling of Intersubunit Contacts During Proteasome Biogenesis.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Article
- Structural basis for regulation of the proteasome 20S core particle by the Parkinsonism-associated proteins FBXO7 and PI31.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Chaperones shape the conformational landscape of 26S-proteasome-base assembly for allosteric ATPase motor activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteasomes are large multisubunit protease complexes found in all domains of life, where they execute regulatory and quality control degradation critical for organismal health. The canonical form of the proteasome, known as the 26S proteasome, consists of a 28-subunit barrel-shaped proteolytic core particle (CP) that is capped on its barrel ends by the 19-subunit regulatory particle (RP). The RP recognizes and captures substrates destined for degradation, mechanically unfolds them using energy derived from ATP, and translocates them through a gated pore at the surface of the CP into the proteolytic sites housed in its hollow center. Due to their exceptional size and subunit complexity, biogenesis of 26S proteasomes is a highly orchestrated process facilitated by dedicated assembly chaperones and conserved features of its subunits. Since the initial discovery of canonical 26S proteasomes, numerous noncanonical CPs harboring distinct subunit compositions have been detected, as have several alternative non-RP regulators of CP function. Here, we review the structure and assembly of canonical and noncanonical forms of the proteasome and highlight recent structural studies that have greatly clarified our understanding of how these fascinating and complicated molecular machines form rapidly and faithfully in the cellular milieu. In addition, we explore the assembly mechanisms that yield plasticity in the subunit composition of proteasomes, as well as emerging evidence of plasticity in the assembly pathways by which proteasomes are built in cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.