Observational studyThe Lancet. Microbe2026
Predicting bloodstream infection by plasma cell-free metagenomic sequencing: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in The Lancet. Microbe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03226158 (Prediction of Adverse Events in Children and Adolescents With Cancer at High Risk of Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prediction of Adverse Events in Children and Adolescents With Cancer at High Risk of Infection (PREDSEQ)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial signal profiles and organism-level concordance between plasma metagenomic sequencing and blood culture in suspected bloodstream infection.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or haematopoietic cell transplantation are at high risk for life-threatening bloodstream infections. A novel pre-emptive treatment paradigm guided by pathogen detection before symptoms appear might reduce this risk, but no validated screening test is available. This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of plasma microbial cell-free DNA metagenomic sequencing (mcfDNA-Seq) for predicting bloodstream infections in children and adolescents receiving therapy for high-risk leukaemia.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, between Aug 9, 2017, and Feb 28, 2022, leftover clinical plasma samples were prospectively collected up to once per day from patients who were younger than 25 years, receiving care for leukaemia at St Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis, TN, USA), and at high risk for life-threatening bloodstream infections. mcfDNA-Seq was used to identify pathogen DNA in blood samples obtained during the 7 days before to 1 day after bloodstream infection onset, and in control samples from the same population in the absence of fever or infection. The testing laboratory was masked to sample status. Primary outcomes were predictive sensitivity of mcfDNA-Seq for detecting the expected bloodstream infection pathogen during the 3 days preceding the day of bloodstream infection onset, with a prespecified favourable sensitivity of 50%, and predictive specificity of mcfDNA-Seq in control samples. Exploratory analyses comprised assessing sensitivity and specificity restricted to bacteria or common bloodstream infection pathogens, and after applying a data-derived DNA fragment concentration cutoff; estimating the predictive sensitivity on each of the 7 days before bloodstream infection onset; identifying clinical characteristics that affected predictive sensitivity or specificity; and examining the clinical relevance of additional organisms identified by mcfDNA-Seq during bloodstream infection episodes. Diagnostic sensitivity was also assessed on samples collected on the day of, or day after, diagnosis of bloodstream infection. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03226158.
findings94 evaluable bloodstream infections occurred in 60 (38%) of 158 enrolled participants; 19 episodes were previously described in the pilot phase of this study. The predictive sensitivity of mcfDNA-Seq was 51·9% (95% CI 40·5-63·1) for all bloodstream infection episodes, 53·8% (42·2-65·2) for bacterial infection only, and 51·9% (40·5-63·1) when applying a DNA fragment concentration cutoff of 140 molecules per μL. Sensitivity was lowest at day -7 and increased daily until the day of diagnosis. Diagnostic sensitivity was 81·3% (95% CI 71·0-89·1) for all bloodstream infection episodes and 83·1% (72·9-90·7) for bacterial infections only. Predictive specificity was 82·7% (95% CI 76·0-88·2), but improved to 88·9% (83·0-93·3) for common bloodstream infection pathogens, and to 93·8% (88·9-97·0) when also applying the DNA fragment concentration cutoff. Predictive sensitivity was higher in participants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11·1 [1·7-74·2] vs those with acute myeloid leukaemia), and it was lower in polymicrobial infections (aOR 0·0 [0·0-0·2] vs monomicrobial Gram-positive infections). Clinical false-positive results were positively associated with gastrointestinal disturbance alone (p=0·037) or combined with recent administration of high-dose cytarabine (p=0·012). Additional organisms identified by mcfDNA-Seq that were not identified by blood culture were less likely than expected organisms to have an increasing DNA concentration during the days preceding bloodstream infection diagnosis.
interpretationmcfDNA-Seq can detect causative pathogens before the onset of some bloodstream infection episodes in profoundly immunocompromised patients. Predictive specificity might be improved by restricting results to a subgroup of relevant organisms, excluding patients with high risk of false-positive results, or applying a higher concentration cutoff. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate mcfDNA-Seq-guided pre-emptive therapy for preventing life-threatening bloodstream infections in patients with high risk.
fundingThe National Cancer Institute, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, and Karius.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.