ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
A single MRI scan contains sufficient imaging information for accurate prediction of meningioma growth risk.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosurgical strategies for monitoring meningiomas and evaluating their growth risk largely rely on serial imaging or invasive sampling, practices that place considerable burdens on both patients and clinical resources. In this study, we present a novel framework for predicting meningioma growth risk using only a single contrast-enhanced MRI scan. Our approach compares a custom-trained fully convolutional neural network encoder and PyRadiomics features at both tumor- and whole-image scale, capturing tumor-specific and peritumoral image features, evaluated using conventional machine learning classifiers. The study cohort includes 192 patients with single meningiomas, categorized as growing, stable, or shrinking, based on volumetric assessments by expert neurosurgeons. Classifiers trained on encoder-derived features achieved the highest F1-scores of 0.97 ± 0.01, demonstrating strong predictive performance particularly when edema content was included. Ensemble learning on encoder- and PyRadiomics-extracted features did not improve accuracy compared to the individual approaches. Prediction performance varied across scanner vendor, field strength, tumor location, and volume quintiles, with 3 T scanners yielding superior results, notably higher accuracy for smaller tumors under 1.73 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.