Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41780349›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026

A single MRI scan contains sufficient imaging information for accurate prediction of meningioma growth risk.

Nima Sadeghzadeh, Jason A Correia, Jiantao Shen, Sung-Min Jun, Poul M F Nielsen, Brendan Davis, Samantha J Holdsworth, Michael Dragunow, Richard L M Faull, Hamid Abbasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nima SadeghzadehAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand. Electronic address: nima.sadeghzadeh@auckland.ac.nz.
Jason A CorreiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Auckland City and Starship Hospitals, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Jiantao ShenAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Sung-Min JunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Auckland City and Starship Hospitals, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Poul M F NielsenAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand; Department of Engineering Science and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Brendan DavisBrisbane Clinical Neuroscience Centre, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Samantha J HoldsworthCentre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; Mātai Medical Imaging Institute, Gisborne 4010, New Zealand; Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Michael DragunowCentre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; Departments of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Richard L M FaullCentre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Hamid AbbasiAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand; Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand. Electronic address: h.abbasi@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurosurgical strategies for monitoring meningiomas and evaluating their growth risk largely rely on serial imaging or invasive sampling, practices that place considerable burdens on both patients and clinical resources. In this study, we present a novel framework for predicting meningioma growth risk using only a single contrast-enhanced MRI scan. Our approach compares a custom-trained fully convolutional neural network encoder and PyRadiomics features at both tumor- and whole-image scale, capturing tumor-specific and peritumoral image features, evaluated using conventional machine learning classifiers. The study cohort includes 192 patients with single meningiomas, categorized as growing, stable, or shrinking, based on volumetric assessments by expert neurosurgeons. Classifiers trained on encoder-derived features achieved the highest F1-scores of 0.97 ± 0.01, demonstrating strong predictive performance particularly when edema content was included. Ensemble learning on encoder- and PyRadiomics-extracted features did not improve accuracy compared to the individual approaches. Prediction performance varied across scanner vendor, field strength, tumor location, and volume quintiles, with 3 T scanners yielding superior results, notably higher accuracy for smaller tumors under 1.73 cm

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaAdultAgedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsArtificial intelligenceBrain tumor behaviorEarly diagnosisEncoder-based feature extractionGrowth predictionMedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID41780349
PMCPMC12969008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.