ArticleESMO open2026
Real-world external control arm for the single-arm LIBRETTO-001 trial of selpercatinib in RET-mutation-positive medullary thyroid cancer: RECALIB-RET.
Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model-Informed Decision Making from Drug Discovery to Reimbursement: A Roadmap for Clinical Pharmacology in Value-Based Healthcare.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe single-arm phase I/II LIBRETTO-001 trial demonstrated durable efficacy with selpercatinib in patients with rearranged during transfection (RET)-mutation-positive medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). RECALIB-RET compared effectiveness outcomes using a real-world external control (EC) arm of patients with RET-mutation-positive MTC treated with standard of care (SoC) versus selpercatinib (LIBRETTO-001). PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, the selpercatinib arm comprised first-line (1L) or second-and-later-line (≥2L) patients from LIBRETTO-001. The EC arm comprised SoC-treated patients, pooled across (i) the French ENDOCAN-TUTHYREF (Refractory Thyroid Tumours) database (1L and ≥2L); (ii) a chart review of European patient medical records (1L and ≥2L) and (iii) a published United States chart review (≥2L). Index treatment was cabozantinib or vandetanib (1L) and any SoC (≥2L; including multikinase inhibitor, chemotherapy or immunotherapy). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The safety profile of SoC in the EC arm was a secondary endpoint. Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics between treatment arms.
resultsBaseline characteristics of the 1L selpercatinib (n = 116) and EC (n = 107) arms were balanced; PSM reduced the sample size by <30% across arms (n = 84 per arm after PSM). 1L selpercatinib conferred statistically significant PFS benefit over SoC both pre-PSM [median: not reached (NR) versus 24.0 months; P < 0.001] and post-PSM (median: NR versus 26.1 months; P < 0.001). In ≥2L (selpercatinib, n = 179; EC, n = 51), PSM increased attrition, reducing sample sizes by 78.8% (selpercatinib) and 25.5% (EC), to n = 38 per arm. The unadjusted median PFS was significantly longer with ≥2L selpercatinib versus SoC (35.6 months versus 11.6 months; P = 0.005); the difference did not reach significance after PSM. Safety findings were consistent with previously reported findings for SoC.
conclusionSelpercatinib conferred significant PFS benefit over SoC in treatment-naïve (1L) patients with RET-mutation-positive MTC, with inconclusive results in the ≥2L setting. Matching retrospective real-world data to prospective trial data is feasible. EC arms to single-arm trials may provide evidence supporting the evaluation of comparative effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.