Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41780072›Full record

ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2026

Deconstruction and reconstruction of degrading effects in ultrasound imaging: aberration, multiple reverberation, and trailing reverberation.

Danai E Soulioti, Rebecca M Jones-Sinnott, Masashi Sode, Francisco Santibanez, Gianmarco F Pinton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Vivo Cavitation-Based Aberration Correction of Histotripsy in Porcine Liver.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Aberration correction in abdominal histotripsy.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danai E SouliotiLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7507-0391
Rebecca M Jones-SinnottLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-0913
Masashi SodeLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-7378
Francisco SantibanezLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6959-4148
Gianmarco F PintonLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4896-1439

Funding

A machine learning ultrasound beamformer based on realistic wave physics for high body mass index imagingR01EB029419 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PINTON, GIANMARCO · 2021 to 2024
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound image degradation in the human body arises from the propagation and reflection of acoustic waves in a complex acoustic environment. The heterogeneous distribution of soft tissue and the variation in acoustic properties distort the ultrasonic beam causing deterioration in image quality, including loss of resolution and contrast. Here, we establish a framework to construct images based on a separable (additive or multiplicative) representation of aberration, multiple reverberation, and trailing clutter. A separable approach enables high modularity and flexibility when generating quantitatively degraded image datasets. This framework provides the capability to generate images with quantitative levels of image degradation related directly to imaging physics, thus allowing for a flexible approach to augmentation techniques in ultrasound imaging datasets, as demonstrated in the included repository code. Experimentally calibrated abdominal simulations were performed in Fullwave2 by matching relevant imaging metrics, such as phase aberration, reverberation strength, speckle brightness, and coherence length, to experimental measurements. Then, simulations were performed to separate and characterize the different components of image degradation. Finally, these components were scaled and combined to construct quantitatively degraded image datasets. Reverberation is shown to be depth and brightness dependent, while aberration and trailing clutter are not. This general framework was tested for values in acoustic ranges that significantly, synthetically, and independently enhance or reduce these effects compared to the levels naturally occurring in the body. Identifying, quantifying, and modeling these differing and complex mechanisms of degradation can be used to develop and test rational approaches to overcome these degradation mechanisms to improve image quality, particularly for traditionally harder to image patients. Additionally, the framework to synthetically modify the effects of aberration, multiple reverberation, and trailing clutter is provided, allowing for the generation of augmented datasets with a wide range of degradation effects, based on imaging physics, to improve machine learning models.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAbdomenAcousticsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansPhantoms, ImagingUltrasonographyVibrationabdominal ultrasoundaberrationacoustic propagationfullwave simulationreverberationtissue brightnesstrailing clutter

Identifiers

PMID41780072
PMCPMC13192475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.