Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41780001›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2026

Neoadjuvant GOLP in Resectable High-Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Guo-Ming Shi, Xiao-Yong Huang, Fei Liang, Xiao Liang, Rui Dong, Qing-Hai Ye, Qiang Gao, Yuan Ji, Zheng-Ping Yu, Wen-Long Zhai and 25 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04669496 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter, Open, Seamless Phase II-III Clinical Trial of PD1 Antibody (Toripalimab), Lenvatinib and GEMOX Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With High-risk Recurrence Factors

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled178ConditionsIntrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, PD1 Antibody, Lenvatinib, Gemox ChemotherapyArmsNeoadjuvant treatment
NCT07599995 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Plus Envafolimab as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resectable Biliary Tract Malignancies at High Risk of Recurrence

TypeinterventionalSponsorSir Run Run Shaw HospitalRan2026 to 2030Enrolled34ConditionsBiliary Tract CancerArmsNeoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Guo-Ming ShiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Xiao-Yong HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Fei LiangDepartment of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Xiao LiangZhejiang Key Laboratory of Multiomics Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Diseases, Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Rui DongDepartment of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Qing-Hai YeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Qiang GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Yuan JiDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Zheng-Ping YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wen-Long ZhaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jia-Cheng LuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.ORCID 0000-0001-9557-264X
Xiao-Wu LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shenzhen General Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Fu-Bao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Kui WangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery II, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai.
Wei YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Jia-Lin ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhi-Qiang HuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Shuang-Jian QiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Xiao-Ying WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Xin-Rong YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Hui-Chuan SunDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Ying-Hong ShiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Zhen-Bin DingDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Wei-Ren LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Xiao-Wu HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Cheng HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Ying-Hao ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Jian SunDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Yi-Feng HeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Yuan-Fei PengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Yang XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Jian-Jun ZouShanghai Junshi Biosciences, Shanghai.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Jia FanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai.
ZSAB Study Group

Funding

Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader 22XD1402700Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC-2020CR1003A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo neoadjuvant treatment has been considered to be standard therapy for patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with high-risk factors for recurrence. The GOLP regimen (gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, lenvatinib, and an anti-programmed death 1 antibody) has shown promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and biliary tract cancer.

methodsIn a phase 2-3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with resectable high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to the neoadjuvant group (intravenous gemcitabine-oxaliplatin plus toripalimab every 3 weeks for three cycles and oral lenvatinib once daily for 9 weeks, followed by curative resection) or the control group (curative resection and no neoadjuvant treatment). All patients received adjuvant capecitabine for eight cycles after surgery. The primary end point was event-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety.

resultsA total of 178 patients underwent randomization (88 patients to the neoadjuvant group and 90 to the control group). At the interim analysis at a median follow-up of 16.9 months, the median event-free survival was significantly longer in the neoadjuvant group (18.0 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.8 to 27.6) than in the control group (8.7 months; 95% CI, 7.2 to 12.4) (P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was 79% (95% CI, 70 to 90) in the neoadjuvant group and 61% (95% CI, 50 to 75) in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.79; P = 0.005, which did not meet the significance criterion [two-sided alpha, 0.0019]). Across all treatment phases, adverse events occurred in 97% of the patients in the neoadjuvant group and in 70% of those in the control group. During the neoadjuvant phase, adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 28% of the patients, and treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher in 26%. No treatment-related adverse event led to death.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant GOLP led to significantly longer event-free survival than control therapy, with mainly low-grade adverse events, among patients with resectable high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (Funded by the Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center and others; ZSAB-neoGOLP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04669496.).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaNeoadjuvant TherapyAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKaplan-Meier EstimateAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCapecitabineGemcitabineImmune Checkpoint InhibitorslenvatinibOxaliplatinPhenylurea CompoundsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorQuinolinestoripalimab

Identifiers

PMID41780001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.