Trial reportBlood advances2026
Refining busulfan exposure enhances pediatric ALL HSCT outcomes: insights from the International FORUM study.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01949129 (Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the conditioning armamentarium in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: is treosulfan ready to challenge total body irradiation?Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model-Informed Precision Dosing: A Review of Busulfan Dosing Optimization in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Yes, we can omit TBI for ALL!Blood advances · 2026Article
- Assessment of minimum discard volume for central venous catheter sampling: Validation via busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric transplant patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe optimal busulfan exposure window in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains to be defined. We identify this window for patients receiving busulfan within the prospective international, randomized controlled phase 3 ALLSCTped 2012 FORUM trial. We included 145 participants receiving fludarabine-busulfan-thiotepa conditioning, with available busulfan plasma levels. Busulfan exposure was estimated using a validated pediatric population pharmacokinetic model. Primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and graft-versus-host disease-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Patients were aged between 0.5 and 19.5 years, with a median follow-up of 5.0 years. The optimal busulfan exposure was defined as area under busulfan concentration curve (cAUC) of 73.3 to 98.0 mg.h/L based on EFS and GRFS. Patients with nonoptimal exposure had lower EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; p = 0.008) and GRFS (HR, 2.01; p = 0.002). Underexposure (cAUC <73.3 mg.h/L) was associated with higher relapse rates (HR, 1.93; p = 0.019), and overexposure (cAUC >98.0 mg.h/L) with an increased risk of treatment-related toxicities and graft-versus-host disease. Patients with optimal busulfan exposure showed no differences in EFS, GRFS, overall survival, or relapse with post hoc matched total-body irradiation (TBI) recipients (n = 51 in each group). This study identifies a favorable busulfan exposure window for pediatric patients with ALL undergoing HSCT from an HLA-matched donor. Therapeutic drug monitoring for optimized personalized busulfan dosing improves HSCT outcomes and might be validated for use as an alternative to irradiation. This trial was registered at EudraCT as 2012-003032-22 and on www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01949129.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.