ArticlePloS one2026
A novel multi objective grey wolf optimization fuzzy miner for process discovery: Incorporating robustness and explainability in model evaluation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Process mining provides methodologies for analyzing, monitoring, and improving processes based on event logs. This study introduces Fuzzy Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimization (Fuzzy MOGWO), which integrates fuzzy modeling with a multi-criteria metaheuristic optimization approach. The proposed framework simultaneously optimizes six metrics: Fitness, Precision, Generalization, Simplicity, Robustness, and Explainability with the latter two newly proposed to evaluate noise resilience and analyst interpretability. A normalized scoring mechanism, based on the L₂ norm of all metrics, ensures balanced evaluation across objectives. Fuzzy MOGWO is benchmarked against Alpha Miner, Inductive Miner, and Fuzzy Miner using 10 synthetic noise-free logs, 10 synthetic noisy logs with 5-20% injected noise, and 3 real-world logs. Under noise-free conditions, it achieved a normalized score of 0.329, surpassing the best baseline (0.288) by 14.24%. In noisy environments, its score (0.440) exceeded the top competitor (0.378) by 16.40%. On real-world logs, it outperformed competitors in 4 out of 6 metrics, compared to 2 out of 6 for the PSO-based miner. These results demonstrate substantially improved effectiveness, robust performance in the presence of noise, and enhanced interpretability, establishing Fuzzy MOGWO as a comprehensive and reliable solution for challenging process discovery tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.