ArticleeLife2026
Deep learning linking mechanistic models to single-cell transcriptomics data reveals transcriptional bursting in response to DNA damage.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating zero-inflation correction and transcriptional kinetics for single-cell transcriptomic analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Using the simple telegraph model to decipher transcriptional burst regulation across genome-wide data.iScience · 2026Article
- Deciphering global transcriptional dynamics coordinated by gene-gene regulatory interactions using single-cell data.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptional Bursting in Pluripotent Stem Cells.Biology · 2026Review
- Cell trajectory inference based on schrödinger problem and a mechanistic model of stochastic gene expression.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells must adopt flexible regulatory strategies to make decisions regarding their fate, including differentiation, apoptosis, or survival in the face of various external stimuli. One key cellular strategy that enables these functions is stochastic gene expression programs. However, understanding how transcriptional bursting, and consequently, cell fate, responds to DNA damage on a genome-wide scale poses a challenge. In this study, we propose an interpretable and scalable inference framework, DeepTX, that leverages deep learning methods to connect mechanistic models and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, thereby revealing genome-wide transcriptional burst kinetics. This framework enables rapid and accurate solutions to transcription models and the inference of transcriptional burst kinetics from scRNA-seq data. Applying this framework to several scRNA-seq datasets of DNA-damaging drug treatments, we observed that fluctuations in transcriptional bursting induced by different drugs were associated with distinct fate decisions: 5'-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine treatment was associated with differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells by increasing the burst size of gene expression, while low- and high-dose 5-fluorouracil treatments in human colon cancer cells were associated with changes in burst frequency that corresponded to apoptosis- and survival-related fate, respectively. Together, these results show that DeepTX enables genome-wide inference of transcriptional bursting from single-cell transcriptomics data and can generate hypotheses about how bursting dynamics relate to cell fate decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.