ArticlePloS one2026
How do young children respond to the distress of others? Applying infrared thermography and behavioural analyses to examine the development of emotion contagion and empathy.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empathy is a core feature of the human social experience, underpinned by the sharing of and understanding of others' states. However, we know relatively little about its early development. Here, we used the emerging technique of infrared thermography, combined with behavioural observations, to investigate how young children (1-3 years old) respond to others' distress. We measured the emotional reactions - including changes in facial skin temperature and behavioural responses - of N = 30 typically developing children from British nurseries while they watched short video-vignettes of familiar and unfamiliar caregivers displaying emotional distress or neutral expressions. We hypothesised that children's facial temperature change and behavioural responses (including facial expressions and self-directed behaviours) would be stronger to distress than to neutral stimuli. Based on the social bias of empathy, we hypothesised that responses would be stronger towards familiar individuals as compared to unfamiliar. Results confirmed that children's thermal response at the nose bridge was stronger when observing someone in distress compared to the neutral control. Although model familiarity had only a weak effect, there was an effect of age, with younger infants showing stronger thermal responses to distress stimuli compared to older children. We found no effect on behavioural responses. We discuss implications of these results, including whether thermal-imagery may be a more sensitive measure of affective responding than behavioural measures, and the importance of using multiple methods. By combining physiological and behavioural measures, this study contributes to theoretical and methodological advances into understanding how internal affective processes map onto external measures in early childhood, shedding light on the development of empathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.