ArticlePloS one2026
Innate defense mechanisms against Nosema ceranae in hygienic honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The honey bee colony (Apis mellifera) acts as a superorganism, with a dual immune system that operates at the individual and social level. However, the linkages between immune mechanisms across the two levels remain poorly understood, despite the relevance for developing effective breeding strategies to improve honey bee disease resistance. Hygienic behavior involving the removal of unhealthy brood is a key component of honey bee social immunity and is highly effective at limiting parasites and pathogens in the colony. While this form of hygienic behavior can reduce brood diseases, parasites infecting adult bees primarily, such as Nosema ceranae, are not directly impacted by the behavior. However, when using the Unhealthy Brood Odor (UBeeO) assay to quantify hygienic behavior performance, hygienic colonies have been shown to maintain lower Nosema spp. loads over time and overall compared to non-hygienic colonies. To investigate the mechanisms driving reduced Nosema spp. in hygienic colonies, we conducted a series of field and lab experiments to test the innate immune performance of individual bees. We evaluated several factors across hygienic and non-hygienic bees including (1) differences in N. ceranae infection levels, (2) survival probability, (3) Vitellogenin and Hymenoptaecin gene expression, and (4) amount of N. ceranae inoculant consumed. We found that hygienic bees consumed less of the inoculant, exhibited upregulated Vitellogenin gene expression at peak N. ceranae infection, showed a positive relationship between Hymenoptaecin gene expression and N. ceranae infection levels, and had greater survivability when infected with N. ceranae, compared to non-hygienic bees. Here, we present new findings that link colony hygienic behavior performance to individual-level resistance and tolerance mechanisms in response to N. ceranae, suggesting broader implications for the success of selective breeding programs targeting hygienic traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.