ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Association between deep learning-based atrial fibrillation burden and in-hospital mortality.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite its clinical significance, research on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden as a dynamic, real-time predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with critical illness is lacking. This study examined the association between high AF burden and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients, using intensive care unit (ICU) data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III; 2001-2012) and Yongin Severance Hospital (2021-2023). Electrocardiogram waveform data were analyzed using deep learning models to calculate AF burden. Adult ICU patients were included, with exclusion of those aged ≥90 years and those with an AF burden >0.9. AF burden was defined as the ratio of AF waveforms to total waveforms during ICU admission, with a high burden defined as ≥7.0%. Logistic regression and machine learning models were employed to assess the association between AF burden and in-hospital mortality, as well as to evaluate the contribution of AF burden to mortality prediction. From the MIMIC-III database, 7,734 patients were included: 5,734 (74.1%) had a low AF burden (median, 0.3%) and 2,000 (25.9%) had a high AF burden (median, 22.5%). High AF burden was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (18.1% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001) and was identified as an independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.95; P < 0.001). Machine learning models demonstrated that AF burden is a significant contributor to mortality prediction, with an area under the curve of 0.86. AF burden may serve as a dynamic marker for real-time alerts of clinical deterioration and for risk stratification in critically ill patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.