Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779697›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

In vivo evaluation of the antibacterial properties of a poly-ε-lysine and hyaluronic acid coated intramedullary implant in a New Zealand White rabbit model.

Julia L van Agtmaal, Sanne W G van Hoogstraten, Noémie Reinert, Cynthia Calligaro, Rajendra Kasinath, Claudia Zindl, Stephan Zeiter, Nihal Engin Vrana, Tim J M Welting, Jacobus J C Arts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia L van AgtmaalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-7399
Sanne W G van HoogstratenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Noémie ReinertAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Cynthia CalligaroSPARTHA Medical, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-3695
Rajendra KasinathDePuy Synthes Biomaterials, Warsaw, Indiana, United States of America.
Claudia ZindlAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Stephan ZeiterAO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8155-4202
Nihal Engin VranaSPARTHA Medical, Strasbourg, France.
Tim J M WeltingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jacobus J C ArtsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication that can arise following joint replacement surgery. PJI treatment is extremely complex due to the formation of bacterial biofilms and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to antibiotic classes commonly used in the treatment of PJI. This critical development highlights the urgent need for novel prophylactic strategies that do not rely on conventional antibiotic agents to prevent bacterial adherence and subsequent biofilm formation on implant surfaces. This study evaluated the contact-killing properties of a supramolecular poly-epsilon-lysine and hyaluronic acid (PEL-10/HA-1) coating on an intramedullary nail in a New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit model. Fifteen female NZW rabbits were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (JAR 060131, 5.9 x 104 CFU in 100 µL PBS) in the right humerus. Seven received an uncoated nail, while eight received a PEL-10/HA-1 coated titanium alloy nail. After 7 days, the rabbits were euthanized for microbiological analysis of the nail and surrounding tissues. Remarkably, microbiological analysis showed that 4/8 of the rabbits with a coated nail had 0 CFU on the nail, versus 1/8 of the rabbits with an uncoated nail. The rinsing solution, soft tissue, and bone samples from the rabbits with a coated nail were more often culture-negative than the samples from rabbits with an uncoated nail. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the CFUs of the coated and uncoated groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the coated and uncoated groups in other infection indicators, including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and plasma protein electrophoresis. While the PEL-10/HA-1 coating had a bacteriostatic and bactericidal effect in vitro, this effect did not translate to in vivo, highlighting a translational gap. The PEL-10/HA-1 coating must be optimized to enhance its antimicrobial effect, ensuring the same promising in vivo effect as previously observed in vitro.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleHyaluronic AcidPolylysineProsthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsBiofilmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleRabbitsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleHyaluronic AcidPolylysine

Identifiers

PMID41779697
PMCPMC12959695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.