Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Selective culinary uses of plant foods by Northern and Eastern European hunter-gatherer-fishers.

Lara González Carretero, Alexandre Lucquin, Harry K Robson, T Rowan McLaughlin, Ekaterina Dolbunova, Jasmine Lundy, Giulia Moretti, Blandine Courel, Manon Bondetti, Marian Berihuete-Azorín and 12 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Lara González CarreteroBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8013-5252
Alexandre LucquinBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Harry K RobsonBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4850-692X
T Rowan McLaughlinHamilton Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Ekaterina DolbunovaThe British Museum, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-9620
Jasmine LundyBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Giulia MorettiThe British Museum, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0208-6832
Blandine CourelThe British Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Manon BondettiBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Marian Berihuete-AzorínDepartment of Prehistory, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-1562
Daniel GroßMuseum Lolland-Falster, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1328-1134
Jacek KabacińskiInstitute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Piotr KittelFaculty of Geographical Sciences, Department of Geology and Geomorphology, University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Elena KostylevaIvanovo State University, Ivanovo, Russia.
Olga LozovskayaInstitute for the History of Material Culture RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey MazurkevichState Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Bente PhilippsenNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-3570
Andrey SkorobogatovVoronezh Archaeological Society, Voronezh, Russia.
Roman V SmolyaninovLipetsk State Pedagogical University PP Semenov-Tyan-Shan, Lipetsk, Russia.
John MeadowsLeibniz Centre for Archaeology (LEIZA), Schleswig, Germany.
Carl HeronThe British Museum, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-7464
Oliver E CraigBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbonised food deposits preserved in pottery vessels, often termed 'foodcrusts,' are frequently encountered on hunter-gatherer-fisher (HGF) pottery throughout Northern and Eastern Europe. While lipid residue analysis is frequently employed to determine their composition, this technique favours the identification of animal products. In this study, we present a combined analytical approach, including high resolution microscopic analysis (Digital Microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy) together with molecular and isotopic analysis of lipids (GC-MS and GC-C-IRMS) and bulk isotope analysis (EA-IRMS) to further understand the composition of foodcrusts. Eighty-five pottery vessels with foodcrusts were analysed from 13 archaeological sites dating from the 6th to the 3rd millennium BC, of which 58 have allowed for identification of plant tissues, such as wild grasses and legumes, fruits, and the roots, tubers, leaves and stems of herbaceous plants. The results demonstrate that the choice of plant foods was remarkably selective, with hunter-gatherers favouring certain plant species and even their parts over others and combining these with specific animal ingredients. The results also reveal that our knowledge of plant processing in pottery is likely to be grossly under-represented by relying on lipid residue analysis alone.

Indexed as

CeramicsCookingPlants, EdibleAnimalsArchaeologyEurope, EasternGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHistory, AncientHumansMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning

Identifiers

PMID41779691
PMCPMC12959656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.