Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Social media analysis reflects the negative sentiments experienced at both time changes with somewhat more depressive impact in early fall.

Ben Ellman, Michael L Smith, Carson Reeling, Nicole J Olynk Widmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben EllmanIndependent Researcher, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Michael L SmithDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University College of Agriculture, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6379-8338
Carson ReelingDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University College of Agriculture, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Nicole J Olynk WidmarDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University College of Agriculture, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We quantify the effect of biannual time changes on sentiment using US online and social media posts from periods around changes to Daylight Saving Time (DST) in the spring and Standard Time (ST) in the fall over the period 2019-2023. We compare sentiment-a measure of individuals overall mood or emotions towards an event-in cities on either side of US time zones the day before and after the societal time change. We find negative shocks to sentiment following both time changes. This effect seems stronger in the fall. Given the amount of daylight relative to a fixed work schedule should be the same in each group of cities on these days, these differences suggest strong negative ceteris paribus reactions to societal time changes, which may indicate preference to abolish these adjustments, although we do not measure preference for DST versus ST. We also use regression analysis to estimate how sentiment changes over time. We find persistent negative impacts from the change to Standard Time in the fall. In contrast, individuals experience a noisy shock to sentiment that attenuates over time. These findings provide evidence that individuals have a more negative reaction to the societal time change to Standard Time in the fall than they do to DST in the Spring. This work highlights the potential that the reaction to societal time changes varies depending on whether moving to or away from DST or Standard Time.

Indexed as

DepressionEmotionsSocial MediaAffectHumansSeasonsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID41779686
PMCPMC12959662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.