ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Prediction of Distant Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionFew machine learning (ML) studies have investigated the prediction of distant metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This retrospective study aimed to develop and validate predictive models based on ML algorithms for RCC patients with distant metastasis.MethodsWe extracted RCC data from the SEER database between 2004 and 2015 (n=192,912) and from the Chinese National Cancer Center (CNCC) database between 2010 and 2020 (n=3,034). Seven different algorithms were applied to predict distant metastasis in RCC. Fivefold cross-validation was employed for model construction. The data were analyzed by using Python based on incomplete data, complete data, upsampling data and downsampling data.ResultsAfter data cleaning and screening, 121,741 cases from the SEER dataset and 2803 cases from the CNCC external test set were retained. For incomplete data, the neural network model [area under the curve (AUC) 95% confidence interval (CI) of the external data: 0.7467±0.0573] achieved the highest accuracy. For the complete data, the support vector machine (SVM) model achieved the highest accuracy, with an AUC 95% CI of 0.8221±0.0485. The disparity between positive and negative samples significantly varied across the different datasets. Upsampling and downsampling analyses were also conducted. For the upsampling data, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with an AUC 95% CI for the external data of 0.8162±0.0558. For the downsampling data, the SVM model achieved the highest accuracy, with an AUC 95% CI of 0.8274±0.0546 for the external data.ConclusionsOur study revealed that ML algorithms can effectively predict distant metastasis in patients with RCC. ML models exhibit favorable application prospects in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.