Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779382›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025

Navigating structural and personal dilemmas: a phenomenological study of midwives providing legal abortion care in Nampula, Mozambique.

Gilda Gondola Sitefane, Khátia Munguambe, Pia Axemo, Johanna Belachew, Birgitta Essén, Esmeralda Mariano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gilda Gondola SitefanePhD Candidate, Department of Women and Children's Health, International Maternal Health, and Migration Unit (IMHm), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-4710-2233
Khátia MunguambeAuxiliary Professor, Department of Community Health, Sexual and Reproductive Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Pia AxemoAuxiliary Professor, Department of Women and Children's Health, International Maternal Health, and Migration Unit (IMHm), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johanna BelachewSenior Lecturer, Department of Women and Children's Health, International Maternal Health, and Migration Unit (IMHm), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Birgitta EssénProfessor, Department of Women and Children's Health, International Maternal Health, and Migration Unit (IMHm), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2900-2849
Esmeralda MarianoAuxiliary Professor, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-3619-5001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legal reform allowing abortion is often considered a proxy for the provision of services. While the law establishes a legal framework, the provision of services is closely tied to the engagement of midwives in service delivery. In 2014, Mozambique decriminalised abortion under specific conditions. Studies of this legal reform focus on the experience of pregnant women, leaving the experience of midwives largely unexplored. This study focuses on midwives providing abortion services to young women (ages 15-24). A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted in Nampula province, northern Mozambique. In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 purposively selected midwives across six primary healthcare facilities in three districts. Inductive thematic analysis was employed, and an intersectionality lens guided the discussion. We employed continuous reflection and adhered to COREQ guidelines for the conduct, analysis and reporting of this study. Despite general support among midwives for abortion service availability and provision, some expressed distress and objections to providing the service themselves. A complex interplay between structural and personal factors was significant in shaping their experiences. Traumatic encounters with abortion-related complications emerged as the central factor behind their distress and objections. The intersections of personal factors with structural dilemmas, including a few health facilities authorised to provide services, a lack of abortion medicines, and legal restrictions for adolescents under age 16, shaped their professional experience, often leading to work-related distress, and challenged their willingness to provide services. Policy efforts should address these barriers, prioritising expansion of service provision, alignment with human rights standards, and midwife training and support.

Indexed as

Abortion, LegalAttitude of Health PersonnelMidwiferyNurse MidwivesAdolescentFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMozambiquePregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultabortionintersectionalitymidwivesMozambiquephenomenologyqualitative studyyoung pregnant women

Identifiers

PMID41779382
PMCPMC13072679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.