ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Navigating structural and personal dilemmas: a phenomenological study of midwives providing legal abortion care in Nampula, Mozambique.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legal reform allowing abortion is often considered a proxy for the provision of services. While the law establishes a legal framework, the provision of services is closely tied to the engagement of midwives in service delivery. In 2014, Mozambique decriminalised abortion under specific conditions. Studies of this legal reform focus on the experience of pregnant women, leaving the experience of midwives largely unexplored. This study focuses on midwives providing abortion services to young women (ages 15-24). A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted in Nampula province, northern Mozambique. In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 purposively selected midwives across six primary healthcare facilities in three districts. Inductive thematic analysis was employed, and an intersectionality lens guided the discussion. We employed continuous reflection and adhered to COREQ guidelines for the conduct, analysis and reporting of this study. Despite general support among midwives for abortion service availability and provision, some expressed distress and objections to providing the service themselves. A complex interplay between structural and personal factors was significant in shaping their experiences. Traumatic encounters with abortion-related complications emerged as the central factor behind their distress and objections. The intersections of personal factors with structural dilemmas, including a few health facilities authorised to provide services, a lack of abortion medicines, and legal restrictions for adolescents under age 16, shaped their professional experience, often leading to work-related distress, and challenged their willingness to provide services. Policy efforts should address these barriers, prioritising expansion of service provision, alignment with human rights standards, and midwife training and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.