ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026
An unusual association: co-use of mineral licks by howler and spider monkeys (Alouatta sara and Ateles chamek).
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mineral licks represent localized sites of high predation risk in western Amazonian forests, where arboreal primates must come to the ground to obtain mineral-rich soils. Polyspecific associations are one potential strategy to mitigate such risks, yet their occurrence at mineral licks has rarely been documented. We recorded 66 co-occurrence events between howler monkeys and spider monkeys based on 3467 trap days across 16 mineral licks in southeastern Peru. Co-occurrences between these two species were significantly more frequent than expected by chance. The vast majority of co-occurrence events showed no signs of aggression or competition, unlike reported interactions between these taxa at other resource sites, such as fruiting trees. We did, however, observe occasional cases in which spider monkeys, especially adult females with infants, displaced howlers from geophagy sites and appeared to display reduced tolerance for close proximity. These interactions were brief and non-aggressive, with howlers yielding space without conflict. Collectively, we extend evidence of howler–spider monkey associations at mineral licks to new species and regions, while underscoring the antipredator pressures and subtle competitive dynamics that structure primate behavior at these ecologically important sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.