ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Toward a minimalist strategy for PFO closure: outcomes and patient experience from 205 ICE-guided procedures performed under local anesthesia and early discharge.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is an established treatment for secondary prevention after PFO-related stroke. Traditionally guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) under general anesthesia, the procedure can now be performed using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) under local anesthesia, supporting a minimalist and potentially outpatient approach. We retrospectively analyzed 205 consecutive patients who underwent ICE-guided PFO closure at Dijon University Hospital between 2018 and 2023. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia, without TEE or anesthesiology support. Procedural success, complications, discharge timing, and patient-reported comfort were evaluated, with clinical follow-up assessing recurrent events. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of patients, with a mean duration of 56 ± 19 min from catheterization laboratory entry to exit. Most patients (94%) were discharged within 24 h of admission, including 44% who underwent the procedure on an outpatient basis. Complications were infrequent (3.4% minor vascular events; one device embolization). Patient comfort was excellent (mean 9.1 ± 1.7/10). At follow-up, no recurrent ischemic events were observed. ICE-guided PFO closure under local anesthesia enables a simplified, anesthesia-free, and highly tolerated procedural pathway. These findings support the adoption of a minimalist interventional approach to streamline PFO management and optimize patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.