ReviewJournal of echocardiography2026
Reverse remodeling after aortic valve intervention in patients with aortic stenosis: echocardiographic assessments and prognostic implications.
Review in Journal of echocardiography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex differences in echocardiographic left ventricular remodeling and clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Journal of echocardiography · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease among the elderly, often leading to chronic left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, myocardial hypertrophy, and fibrosis. Following surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (SAVR/TAVI), relief of afterload can induce reverse remodeling - characterized by reductions in LV size, LV mass index (LVMI), improvements in LV ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and left atrial (LA) parameters. The extent of reverse remodeling varies significantly among patients and is closely associated with prognosis. Greater regression in LVMI and improvements in LVEF or GLS have been linked to reduced cardiovascular events and mortality. Conversely, persistent LV hypertrophy, lack of LVEF improvement, or impaired GLS recovery are associated with adverse outcomes. Factors influencing reverse remodeling include underlying myocardial conditions such as advanced fibrosis, or comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes, and/or residual hemodynamic burden [ e.g., elevated blood pressure, prosthesis-patient mismatch, residual aortic regurgitation (AR)]. Echocardiographic assessment of LVMI, LVEF, GLS, and LA indices enables clinicians to evaluate reverse remodeling, stratify risk, and guide post-operative management. Emerging evidence suggests GLS and LA strain may provide prognostic information beyond conventional LVEF. Optimizing hemodynamic conditions and considering early intervention before irreversible myocardial damage could help promote reverse remodeling and may improve long-term outcomes. Comprehensive echocardiographic follow-up is essential for identifying patients at higher residual risk and support its role in risk stratification following valve intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.