Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779326›Full record

ArticleOncology and therapy2026

Exploring Patient Perspectives on Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Dina Filipenko, Michael Acquadro, Ola Ghatnekar, Carl Haakon Samuelsen, Ingolf Griebsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dina FilipenkoPPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, The Ark, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK. Dina.Filipenko@thermofisher.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-4367
Michael AcquadroPPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, The Ark, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK.
Ola GhatnekarGlobal Health Economics and Outcome Research, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carl Haakon SamuelsenGlobal Health Economics and Outcome Research, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingolf GriebschGlobal Health Economics and Outcome Research, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient interview data exploring the experiences of the most relevant symptoms and impacts of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) remain scarce. This study aimed to develop a conceptual disease model (CDM) of UTUC grounded in patients' own experiences of UTUC and to capture disease-specific symptoms and impacts experienced before, during, and after cancer treatment.

methodsA targeted literature review (TLR) informed the qualitative interview guide development. Qualitative concept elicitation interviews were then performed with patients who had UTUC to understand their experiences of the disease and its treatment, focusing on symptoms and impacts. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti

resultsWe interviewed 15 adults with UTUC (mean age, 56 years), including nine with low-grade and six with high-grade UTUC. Patients reported 22 symptoms: 11 pre-treatment and 21 during treatment and/or post-treatment. The most frequently reported pre-treatment symptoms were blood in urine (60%), fatigue/tiredness (53%), and pain (47%). During or post-treatment, the most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue/tiredness (93%), pain (47%), and weight loss (40%). Patients with low- and high-grade UTUC reported comparable numbers of distinct symptoms, both pre- and post-treatment. UTUC and its treatment impacted patients' emotional well-being (100%), activities of daily life (73%), relationships (73%), social functioning (60%), sleep (60%), and physical functioning (27%), and treatment burden was explicitly mentioned by 13%. The CDM of UTUC was developed, capturing the symptoms and impacts experienced by patients with low- or high-grade UTUC.

conclusionsThis qualitative study identified a broad range of symptoms and impacts of UTUC and its treatment, highlighting the unmet patient needs associated with current UTUC management. Our findings provide a qualitative foundation to inform endpoint and clinical outcome assessment selections in clinical research and to guide patient-centered care strategies for UTUC.

Indexed as

Conceptual disease modelDisease burdenEmotional well-beingHealth-related quality of lifePatient experience dataQualitative interviewsSymptomsUTUC

Identifiers

PMID41779326
PMCPMC13305077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.