Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779279›Full record

Observational studyClinical drug investigation2026

Over-the-Counter Product Use Among Individuals with Vitiligo: A Cross-Sectional International Survey.

N O Enwereji, O C Opaigbeogu, A Geisler, M S Ceresnie, N C Ezekwe, N Elbuluk, Richard H Huggins

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N O EnwerejiDepartment of Dermatology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
O C OpaigbeoguTulane Department of Dermatology, New Orleans, LA, USA.
A GeislerDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M S CeresniePhotomedicine and Photobiology Unit, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, 3031 W. Grand Blvd, Suite 700, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
N C EzekweDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
N ElbulukDepartment of Dermatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard H HugginsPhotomedicine and Photobiology Unit, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, 3031 W. Grand Blvd, Suite 700, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. Rhuggin1@hfhs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0671-4774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesVitiligo is challenging to treat and may have a substantial impact on quality of life. Despite the exponential growth in the development of new "traditional" vitiligo treatments, many vitiligo patients choose to employ medical products and practices that are used with or instead of standard medical care (complementary and alternative medicine or CAM). In this study, CAMs and camouflage were discussed together and referred to as over-the-counter products (OTCs). Using an observational cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the motivations and demographic factors of individuals with vitiligo who use OTCs, to identify the most utilized OTCs in this population, and to assess side effects and perceived efficacy of the utilized OTCs.

methodsWe performed an international observational cross-sectional study between July 2021 and June 2022. An anonymous digital questionnaire was distributed to adults (aged ≥ 18 years) who had been diagnosed with vitiligo by a healthcare provider via e-mails from the Global Vitiligo Foundation to vitiligo support groups and through postings on the MyVitiligoTeam social media network. Participants were presented with a predefined list of OTC products and an open-ended option was also provided.

resultsOf the 224 respondents, half were aged 45-64, most were female (69.6%), and the majority were White (56.3%). A total of 41.1% of participants used OTCs, either exclusively (19.2%) or with prescribed therapies (22%), while 58.9% used only prescribed therapies. The top reasons for using OTCs were dissatisfaction with conventional therapy, concerns about side effects, inconvenience, and cost. The most commonly used OTCs were camouflage, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, zinc, ginkgo biloba, and vitamin C. Camouflage was reported as the most helpful OTC. Mild side effects were reported by 6.3% of users.

conclusionThis study highlights the widespread use of OTCs in managing vitiligo, emphasizing the need for healthcare providers to be familiar with commonly used OTCs. Patients using OTCs raised concerns about conventional treatments, which should be considered in management discussions and drug development. Camouflage was the most beneficial OTC in this study, and it should be included in management plans. A better understanding of OTCs could improve treatment strategies and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Nonprescription DrugsVitiligoAdolescentAdultAgedComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.