Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779270›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Transfer of statistical learning from speech perception to production generalizes to reading.

Kyle D Huffaker, Lori L Holt, Nazbanou Nozari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle D HuffakerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. kydahuff@iu.edu.
Lori L HoltDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nazbanou NozariDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.

Funding

Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences NSF-BCS-2346989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past research has shown that short-term exposure to speech carrying certain acoustic statistics transfers robustly to speech production. However, all studies reporting such transfer have used auditory repetition tasks. Therefore, it is unclear whether perception-production transfer in the acoustic-phonetic domain extends to tasks without an auditory model to probe production. We answer this question in two experiments. Experiment 1 shows that people read aloud the words BEER and PEER differently after exposure to auditory samples of "beer" and "peer" drawn from a distribution of standard American English versus a distribution of slightly accented speech. Experiments 2A and 2B replicate this finding and show generalization to reading a new word pair (BEACH/PEACH) and a new nonword pair (BEETH/PEETH). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the perception-production transfer in the acoustic-phonetic domain extends beyond auditory repetition tasks to production tasks without an explicit auditory model, and that this transfer generalizes to new syllables.

Indexed as

Generalization, PsychologicalReadingSpeechSpeech PerceptionTransfer, PsychologyHumansPhoneticsPhonetic convergenceReadingSpeech perceptionSpeech productionStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID41779270
PMCPMC12960428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.