ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
The spongy heart paradox: balancing bleeding and clotting risk in left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is an increasingly recognized cardiomyopathy with distinctive structural features and a disproportionate risk of systemic thromboembolism. The clinical dilemma of anticoagulation is pressing: while impaired systolic function and deep trabecular recesses predispose to thrombus formation, anticoagulation simultaneously increases bleeding risk, particularly in older patients with multiple comorbidities. Conventional risk scores such as CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED were derived from atrial fibrillation populations and remain unvalidated in LVNC, limiting their clinical applicability. Advanced imaging modalities, particularly cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), provide incremental value by quantifying trabeculation, identifying thrombus, and characterizing fibrosis; however, their integration into risk algorithms is inconsistent. This review synthesizes available evidence, highlights the limitations of current approaches, and emphasizes the need for individualized, dynamic assessment of both thromboembolic and bleeding risks. Future priorities include the development of LVNC-specific risk prediction models, the establishment of prospective multicenter registries, and the incorporation of imaging and biomarker data into precision anticoagulation strategies to guide therapy in this rare but high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.