ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Neonatal bedside laparotomy in the UK: a multidisciplinary survey of practice and perceptions.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEmergency neonatal laparotomy can be undertaken on the intensive care unit (ICU) or in the operating theatre. The evidence-base establishing indications, benefits or disadvantages is limited. We conducted a multidisciplinary survey of UK neonatal surgical centres to describe current practice.
methodsA 16-item online survey was developed, and responses sought from one anaesthetist, one neonatologist and one surgeon at each of the 25 neonatal surgery centres in the UK. Quantitative responses were analysed with descriptive statistics (IBM SPSS Statistics v30). Free-text responses were subjected to qualitative thematic analysis.
results23 anaesthetists, 23 neonatologists, and 23 paediatric surgeons responded (69/75; 92%). At least one response was received from every centre. Cotside laparotomy is carried out in 22 (88%) of centres. 44 (64%) respondents preferred operating in theatre although a significant minority favoured cotside surgery (13 (19%)). Only 5 (20%) centres reported having formal indications for cotside laparotomy. Centres with established pathways performed a significantly higher proportion of cotside laparotomies compared to centres without established guidelines (p < 0.001). Factors influencing decision to operate at the cotside were patient-specific: cardiovascular instability (86%), ventilator dependence (70%) and low birthweight (42%). 46 (67%) respondents recalled complications associated with theatre-based operating including hypothermia (41%), airway complications (15%) and cardiovascular instability (10%). Respondents perceived bedside surgery to be constrained by limited space (62%), disturbance to NICU families and staff (56%) and lack of neonatal surgical instruments (49%).
conclusionThis study establishes the first UK dataset on location of neonatal laparotomy, revealing marked variation in practice based on institutional preference, signalling need for national guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779217What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.