ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Real-world monitoring strategies and predictors guiding the transition from active surveillance to treatment in ISUP 1 prostate cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeActive surveillance (AS) is the standard approach for managing ISUP 1 prostate cancer (PCa), ensuring oncological safety while minimizing overtreatment. However, AS protocols vary significantly. This study assessed a structured AS protocol incorporating PSA kinetics, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and targeted biopsies to identify predictors of treatment transition.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 89 patients with ISUP 1 PCa managed with AS between 2010 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were PSA < 10 ng/mL and ≤ 2 positive biopsy cores with ≤ 50% tumor involvement per core. Patients underwent regular PSA testing, mpMRI, and risk-adapted biopsies. Outcomes included treatment conversion, progression predictors, and the role of mpMRI.
resultsMedian follow-up was 52.8 months. PSA was monitored at a median interval of 4.8 months, and mpMRI every 15.7 months (median). At diagnosis, 68.5% underwent mpMRI, with PIRADS 4 as the most frequent. During AS, 66.3% underwent at least one re-biopsy, most commonly triggered by PSA progression (73%). Treatment was initiated in 37.1% after a median of 37.9 months due to PSA progression (54.5%), mpMRI changes (21.2%), combined PSA/mpMRI findings (6.1%), histological upgrading (9.1%), or patient preference (3%). Treatments included radical prostatectomy, EBRT or LDR brachytherapy. Among these patients, no PSA persistence was observed; biochemical recurrence occurred in 6.1%, metastases in 4.0%, and overall mortality in 4.5%, with no PCa-specific deaths.
conclusionA structured, risk-adapted AS protocol using PSA kinetics and mpMRI enabled personalized management and timely detection of progression. These findings support the standardization of AS protocols, which should be validated in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.