ArticleParasitology research2026
Serological investigation on Sarcocystis spp. infection and associated risk factors in South American camelids in Italy.
Article in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protozoa of the genus Sarcocystis have an obligate two-host-prey-predator life cycle, in which South American Camelids (SAC) are among the intermediate hosts for certain species. Sarcocystis spp. infection has been well documented in SAC in endemic areas of the South America, while data from Europe are absent. This study assessed the seroprevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in SAC in Italy investigating related risk factors. A total of 506 SAC sera (486 alpacas and 20 llamas) from 38 sampling sites were analysed to detect antibodies to Sarcocystis spp. using the Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT). A seropositivity of 15.2% (77/506) was found, corresponding to 14.4% (70/486) in alpacas and 35.0% in llamas (7/20). Risk factor analysis showed that Sarcocystis spp. seropositivity increased with age, while no statistically significant association was found with regard to sex. Access to stables and/or pasture by dogs was identified as a putative risk factor, particularly as the number of dogs increased. Further association was found between seropositivity to Sarcocystis spp. and N. caninum. Although the life cycles of Sarcocystis spp. in SAC are not fully elucidated, these findings highlight the need for further studies to clarify the potential role of dogs as definitive hosts for Sarcocystis species infecting SAC in Europe. This study provides for the first time data on specific antibodies for Sarcocystis spp. in SAC in Europe, highlighting the need of improving the surveillance of this protozoan in camelids, particularly given the growing interest in camelid meat production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.