ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Urethritis-A practical update].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [29/m with urethral discharge and burning during urination : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 66].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPenile urethritis is a common medical condition, usually caused by sexually transmitted pathogens such as Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) or Mycoplasma genitalium (MG). Although the causative pathogens cannot be reliably distinguished based on the clinical presentation alone, symptom-oriented empirical antibiotic therapy is often administered in practical care. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis is a summary of the recommendations from the S3 guidelines on the management of male adolescents and adults with symptoms of urethritis. The development of the guidelines was funded by the Innovation Committee of the Federal Joint Committee (Innovationsausschuss des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses, G‑BA; grant number 01VSF21021).
resultsThe guidelines present a symptom-oriented, evidence-based approach for suspected penile urethritis, considering pathogen epidemiology and possible coinfections and contains a flowchart for clinical management. This includes criteria for or against empirical antibiotic therapy before receiving pathogen detection results as well as guidance on the classification as gonococcal or non-gonococcal urethritis based on clinical and microscopic findings. The recommendations for empirical therapy advise against the use of azithromycin as first-line treatment of urethritis to avoid further promoting resistance in NG and MG. DISCUSSION: A detailed presentation of the recommendations and underlying evidence can be found in the freely accessible guideline publication at the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF): https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/013-099 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.