ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Risk factors affecting the outcome of upper cervical spine injuries in the elderly - role of operative vs. conservative treatment.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective Cohort Study.
objectivesTo evaluate risk factors for adverse outcome and complications of elderly patients with upper cervical spine fracture following conservative or surgical treatment.
methods141 cases of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) admitted between 01/2013 and 12/2015 with upper cervical spine injuries were retrospectively analyzed through our prospectively collected database. Median follow-up was 113.5 days (IQR: 21–393).
resultsWith a collective median age of 79, operatively treated patients (41%, 58/141) were younger compared to conservatively treated (76 vs. 83 years, p < 0.001). Ground level falls were the most common injury mechanism (55% vs. 54%, p = 0.91) while Anderson type II (29.1%) and combined odontoid/atlas fractures (28.2%) were the most frequent injury patterns. Complications were significantly increased in operated patients (67% vs. 49%, p = 0.035) when compared to those conservatively treated. Neurological and rheumatic comorbidities, as well prolonged operation time, had a significant association to postoperative delirium. The duration of surgery (47 vs. 59 min, p = 0.014) and the risk for secondary dislocation (22% vs. 60%, p = 0.086) were reduced through posterior C1-2 screw fixation, as compared to anterior direct osteosynthesis.
conclusionConsiderations regarding appropriate treatment of upper cervical spine injuries include age, comorbidities and individual risk factors as well as injury patterns. As results for initial conservative treatment in geriatric patients show promising results, indication for operative management should be strict and duration of surgery kept minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.