ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Magnetic resonance imaging-based detection of retinal hemorrhages in a multicenter cohort of abusive head trauma.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn pediatric abusive head trauma (AHT), retinal hemorrhages are a key diagnostic feature. Detection by fundoscopy may be delayed or limited, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables non-invasive, objective assessment on routine brain sequences.
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic utility of different MRI sequences-particularly susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), T2*-weighted (T2*w), and morphological sequences-in detecting retinal hemorrhages in AHT. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study (2006-2015), 57 well-documented AHT cases from three German institutions were analyzed. A subgroup consisted of "confession cases." MRI scans were reviewed for retinal hemorrhages across SWI, T2*w, T1-weighted, T2-weighted (T2w), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences by blinded expert readers. Fundoscopy results served as the gold standard. Sensitivities were calculated for each sequence, and "confession" versus "non-confession" cases were compared.
resultsFundoscopy detected retinal hemorrhages in 44 of 56 evaluable cases (78.6%). MRI identified retinal hemorrhages most frequently on gradient recalled echo sequences, with SWI showing higher sensitivity compared to T2*w (76.9% vs. 47.8%). T2w imaging showed markedly lower sensitivity (30.3%) but detected retinal hemorrhages on one eye missed on T2*w imaging in two cases. In three cases, MRI detected retinal hemorrhages not reported on fundoscopy. No statistically significant differences were found between "confession" and "non-confession" cases across all parameters considered (P>0.05).
conclusionMRI-particularly SWI and, to a lesser extent, T2*w imaging-may offer a useful tool of detecting retinal hemorrhages in AHT when fundoscopy is limited. T2w imaging may provide complementary information in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.