ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2026
Risk assessment of fungicides on symbiotic phase of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protocols for the development of the guidance on the risk assessment of PPP to non-target arthropods, in-soil organisms and non-target terrestrial plants.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use of plant protection products (PPPs) may lead to soil contamination, potentially compromising the symbiotic integrity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in agricultural systems. However, the effects of PPPs on AMF are underexplored due to the absence of standardized methodology for ecotoxicological assessments. The objective of this study was to introduce an in vivo method for assessing the effects of PPP pollutants on the AMF symbiotic phase and to evaluate the suitability of this method as an intermediate-tier protocol in risk assessment frameworks. Four tests were conducted using combinations of: (1) Gigaspora albida + Glycine max; (2) G. albida + Urochloa brizantha; (3) Rhizophagus clarus + G. max; (4) R. clarus + U. brizantha). All assays were performed in tropical artificial soil (TAS) under a gradient of chlorothalonil concentrations (0, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 mg a.i. kg⁻1). The evaluated endpoints included total root colonization, percentage of arbuscules colonization, total extraradical mycelial length (ERM), and spore number. All endpoints were sensitive to the presence of PPPs in TAS, with mycorrhizal colonization and ERM being the most sensitive, meeting the validity criteria (CV < 30%). The Inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for all endpoints were higher than the predicted environmental concentrations (PECs). Therefore, this method can be considered suitable as an intermediate-tier protocol, as it exhibits key characteristics of a standardized approach and can be applied to ecotoxicological studies involving other potentially contaminating PPPs, as well as additional classes of environmental contaminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.