ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Simple and reliable method for predicting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow rates and circuit pressures.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is essential for patients with severe respiratory failure who do not respond to conventional mechanical ventilation. Adequate ECMO flow and safe circuit pressure are critical; however, cannula selection, which has a great impact on these factors, is often based on empirical judgment. This study aimed to develop a simple predictive method based on fluid dynamics for estimating ECMO flow rate and circuit pressures (P1: pre-pump, P2: pre-oxygenator, and P3: post-oxygenator). This experimental predictive model study compared the calculated and measured ECMO parameters across 36 combinations of cannula sizes, pump speeds, and bed heights. A laboratory-based ECMO circuit model was assembled with various drainage and return cannulas, an oxygenator, tubing, and a centrifugal pump. The circuit was primed with a 33% glycerin solution and tested across the 36 combinations. A four-step prediction method was applied: (1) modeling the pressure-flow relationships of ECMO components and the pump using manufacturer data; (2) identifying the expected flow rate by locating the intersection of the total circuit resistance and pump output curves; (3) sequentially calculating pressure drops across the circuit; and (4) adjusting pressures based on bed height.
resultsThe predicted flow rate and circuit pressure values were compared to experimental measurements across the 36 combinations. The calculated and measured values showed strong agreement (R
conclusionsOur newly developed method reliably predicts the ECMO flow rate and circuit pressure. Hence, it can be considered a valuable tool for preemptively selecting the optimal cannula size for ECMO, thus improving patient safety and circuit management. Furthermore, it may be a valuable educational tool, making complex hemodynamic concepts more intuitive for trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.