SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
A meta-analysis of smoking and fracture risk to update the FRAX® tool.
Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cumulative Lifestyle Profiles and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Older Women: A Nationwide Korean Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Overview of Osteoporosis and Rotator Cuff Disease.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
88 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this meta-analysis of international cohorts, current smoking is confirmed as a significant BMD-independent predictor of future fracture with a stronger relationship in men than in women. A causative and reversible effect of smoking on fracture risk is suggested by past smoking having a significantly lower risk than current smoking. PURPOSE: In this meta-analysis of international cohorts, the aim was to examine the relationship of current and past smoking with fracture risk to provide an update for future iterations of the FRAX tool.
methodsThe risk of fracture associated with current and past smoking was estimated using an extended Poisson model applied separately to each of 58 prospective international cohort studies. Covariates included current time since start of follow up, current age, and in an additional model, BMD at the femoral neck. The results of the different studies were merged by using inverse-variance weighted β-coefficients.
resultsThis analysis included a total of 1,691,024 participants (61.2% women, overall mean age 58.8 years). Current smoking, documented in 12.1% of all participants (15.2% and 10.1% respectively in men and women), was associated with a significantly increased risk of any clinical fracture, osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, and particularly hip fracture in both sexes. The hazard ratio (HR) for fracture was greater in men than in women for all fracture categories [e.g. hip fracture HR (95% confidence interval): 1.78 (1.58-2.00) vs. 1.64 (1.50-1.78)]. Low BMD explained about 19-54% of the increase in risk. When compared with never smoking, past smoking was associated with a significantly lower risk than current smoking [e.g. hip fractures for men, HR in past smokers: 1.08 (1.05-1.12) vs. 1.73, 95%CI (1.46-2.05) in current smokers].
conclusionsOur results confirm the association between current smoking and increased fracture risk that is partly independent of BMD; these data will be used to inform future iterations of FRAX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.