Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779008›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Nonmetastatic Para-aortic Lymph Node Remodeling as a Predictor of Outcome in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Louis Baudin, Léa Zanella, Alizée Lebeau, Clémence Pleyers, Noémie Gubbels, Silvia Blacher, Laurence Seidel, Athanasios Kakkos, Frédéric Goffin, Pierre Lovinfosse and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Louis Baudin *Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0003-7746-695X
Léa Zanella *Laboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0002-7690-3567
Alizée LebeauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Liege (CHU-Liège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-3232
Clémence PleyersDepartment of Oncological Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Namur (CHU-UCL-Namur), Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0002-2536-1884
Noémie GubbelsLaboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0003-5574-0647
Silvia BlacherLaboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5839-5541
Laurence SeidelBiostatistics and Research Method Center (B-STAT), CHU-ULiège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-269X
Athanasios KakkosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Liege (CHU-Liège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-1819
Frédéric GoffinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Liege (CHU-Liège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0007-6934-1881
Pierre LovinfosseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège (CHU-Liège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7718-1095
Christine GennigensDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liège (CHU-Liège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4526-6219
Sébastien PirsonLaboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0005-8843-0367
Frédéric KridelkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Liege (CHU-Liège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-6967
Agnès NoelLaboratory of Tumor and Development Biology, GIGA, University of Liège (ULiège), Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-6179

Funding

Fondation Hospitalo Universitaire Leon FredericqFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (FNRS)Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (FNRS) EOS - 40007532Fonds speciaux de la recherche (ULege)Fonds speciaux de la recherche (ULiege)Stichting Tegen Kanker (Fondation Contre le Cancer)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is guided notably by the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines; unfortunately, relapse remains frequent despite standard chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy. We evaluated whether histologic assessment of nonmetastatic para-aortic lymph nodes (PAoLN) provides prognostic value in LACC. EXPERIMENTAL

designPrimary tumor and PAoLNs from 137 patients with nonmetastatic LACC were stratified by pretherapeutic 18F-2'-deoxy-2'-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT into pelvic PET-positive (pPET+, n = 72) and pelvic PET-negative (pPET-, n = 65) groups. Immunohistochemistry on whole sections assessed germinal centers, CD4+, CD8+, FOXP3+ cells, neutrophils [CD66b+, neutrophil extracellular traps (NET)], and high-endothelial venules (HEV). Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) were examined via uni- and multivariate analyses after a median follow-up of 55.4 months.

resultsThe primary tumor profile was not associated with outcome, whereas PAoLN features were strongly predictive. In pPET- patients, higher NETs were associated with shorter PFS [P = 0.015; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.768], whereas an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio improved outcomes (P = 0.047, HR = 0.497). In pPET+ patients, shorter PFS was linked to FOXP3+ (P = 0.04, HR = 1.918) and proliferating FOXP3+ cell (P = 0.018, HR = 1.668) density. Across the full cohort, abundant germinal centers (P = 0.0355, HR = 0.273) and an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio (P = 0.001, HR = 0.490) independently correlated with lower recurrence risk. Internal validation was conducted through a bootstrap resampling method. Combinatorial analyses revealed distinct predictive signatures according to pPET status: higher NETs, fewer germinal centers, and International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics IIA1 to IIIB status predicted relapse in pPET- patients.

conclusionsIntegrating pPET status with PAoLN histologic analyses improves recurrence risk stratification in LACC. PAoLN evaluation may serve as a complementary tool to guide treatment intensification and surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41779008
PMCPMC13223557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.