ReviewCritical care explorations2026
Medication Effects on Heart Rate Variability in Critical Illness: The Overlooked Confounder.
Review in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A reporting checklist for human and animal heart rate variability research.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic nervous system function and has emerged as a potential noninvasive biomarker for early detection of physiologic deterioration in critical illness. HRV-based prediction models show promise; however, translation into routine ICU practice has been limited. A major barrier is the insufficient characterization of medication effects on HRV. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in critical care, including vasopressors, steroids, and antiarrhythmics, can directly or indirectly alter autonomic tone, yet existing studies rarely account for these influences. As a result, medication-induced HRV changes may represent meaningful therapeutic response or misleading confounding noise, complicating interpretation. Current studies do not adequately account for medication exposure when evaluating HRV in critical illness. We outline research priorities focused on quantifying medication effects, integrating medication exposure into predictive modeling, evaluating HRV as a marker of treatment response, and determining the utility of HRV as a treatment target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.