ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026
Regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data with missing causes of failure: A direct likelihood approach.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data is often required and plays an important role in many areas. For the situation, in addition to competing risk and interval censoring, another feature that makes the analysis difficult is that the failure cause may be unknown or missing. Most existing methods for addressing these challenges rely on two-stage estimation procedures, which could suffer efficiency loss and high computational cost. To overcome these, we propose a direct likelihood approach based on a mixture model framework. The proposed method accounts for both competing risks and missingness of event types directly in a likelihood function and facilitates estimation through a sieve maximum likelihood estimation, simplifying the estimation procedure and thus enhancing the estimation efficiency. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimators are established, and the idea behind the proposed approach can be extended to other competing risks model frameworks. We demonstrate the promising performance of the proposed method in a comprehensive simulation study and illustrate its practical utility with an application to an Alzheimer's disease study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.